
The situation on Madagascar is a mess. It is the fourth biggest island in the world, with a population of just over 20 million, so it's not over-populated. A lot of the land is poor, but there are extensive mineral resources, while Madagascar's tourism potential have never been developed fully.
Since Marc Ravalomanana came to power the mineral resources of the island have been opened to greater exploitation. This had not eased poverty, and seventy per cent of the people are estimated to live on less than $2 a day. This is the old story of "Resource curse", where the people of a country rich in natural resources often end up poorer than those of nations without such resources. Sections of the mining company are alive to the problem of resource curse, and have aimed to put in place mechanisms to ensure that more of the money from a country's mineral wealth go to the people.
Naturally, there is a lot of frustration, but must all the country's problems be laid at the feet of President Ravalomanana? He is quite unusual in Africa - a man who became wealthy prior to entering politics, rather than using his political control to enrich himself and impoverish the nation. Opposition leader Andry Rajoelina accuses him of being a tyrant, but let's not forget Ravalamana was elected for a second term as president only three years' ago.
And who is Andry Rajoelina? Nobody knows much about him, apart from the fact that he has made quite a lot of loot in his thirty-four years. He is also a former disc jockey. Now while the ranks of the world's leaders have been filled by a wide variety of occupations, skill in changing records or CDs, and an ability to keep people boogeying away to their hearts' content, are not really high in a rulers' skill-sets.
There is also the suspicion that Rajoelina is merely a trojan horse for those former rulers, especially people linked to the not very democratic rule of former president Desire Ratsiraka. They have never forgiven Ravalomanana for wresting control from them in 2001.
Rajoelina doesn't inspire trust. What's more he seems to have no time for the will of the people whom he claims to represent. Like many leaders of past and present he believes he knows the will of the people so well he doesn't have to bother asking them.
He wants to replace Ravalomanana. He has issued ultimata to the president to leave by a set time. He has promised that he would then "say goodbye" in person before taking the helm himself. He has rubbished the offer of a referendum offered by Ravalomanana, deriding it as a last desperate role of the dice. Ravalomanana is unpopular, yet he still commands support in many areas. We have seen strikes and demonstrations over the past few weeks, but these have mostly been confined to the capital Antananarivo. Rajoelina suspects that such a referendum might show that while the president is unpopular, that doesn't automatically mean the self-appointed leader of the opposition to him is viewed as the automatic solution.
The most recent Rajoelina act is to "demand" that the security forces arrest the president. He has set up a parallel administration, complete with prime minister and justice minister. Such an action is tantamount to a seizure of power. The security forces are divided, an indication of how restricted Rajoelina's support base is. Sections of the army are no longer taking orders from the president, while a segment of the army has ousted the presidentially-appointed chief-of-staff.
Even if Ravalomanana was to hand over power now to Rajoelina is it not possible that the charismatic former DJ will be unable to solve Madagascar's many problems? This may lead to street protests and further instability. Foreign investment would shy away even more. It would set a dangerous precedent; the only way ti respond to unpopular governments is by mass demonstrations. This says that change cannot come through the ballot box.